Mega Hogs and Other Things

I have a post up at Frame 352 about Monster Quest's Mega Hog episode.


Working away on the new Trickster's Realm column for Tim Binnall's Binnall of America. It's about MUFON's take on the Stephenville lights.

Also working on some responses to some pieces in the current UFO Magazine; Alfred Lehmberg's, and Colin Bennett's.

Turkish UFO researcher Farah Yurdozu has an item up on Women Of Esoterica: From Mars to Brazil.

On the UFO Magazine blog, there is an interesting entry by UFO Magazine and UFO researcher Sean Casteel: Curiosity Is Not Enough. He asks about "almost abductees" those of us who've
experienced missing time, telepathic communications, sightings, etc. but no memory of seeing greys or being inside craft, etc. YES! I respond. . . you can read more here.

Saw Beowulf the other night; didn't much like it. And I was a folklore major! Hmm, maybe that's why I didn't like it. I didn't hate it, (not like I did Spartan 300, that join the army and kill people in Iraq piece of propaganda, po mo tripe) but, didn't love it either. Yeah, I know, who cares.

Circus Folk Blood-line

This has nothing to do with UFOs or the paranormal; not directly. But I often say I come from circus folk, in the context of those critics of UFOlogy for being too circus like. It's true; I do come from circus folk. My grandfather on my father's side was Duke R. Lee, actor, stunt man, impersonator, circus performer. My grandmother, Louise Gladstone Lee was one of the "Gladstone Sisters," performing in Vaudeville, before joining the circus. My father was in the Tom Mix circus when he was a kid.

Here are some of the films Duke Lee, Sr. appeared in:

1. My Darling Clementine (1946) (uncredited) .... Townsman
2. Mountain Rhythm (1939) (uncredited) .... Rancher
3. The Lone Ranger Rides Again (1939) (uncredited) .... Deputy [Ch. 1]
4. Stagecoach (1939) (uncredited) .... Lordsburg sheriff
5. Feud of the Range (1939) (as Duke Lee) .... Sheriff
6. Santa Fe Stampede (1938) (uncredited) .... Townsman
7. Overland Stage Raiders (1938) (uncredited) .... Henchman
8. Marie Antoinette (1938) (uncredited) .... Coach Driver
9. The Soldier and the Lady (1937) (uncredited) .... Peasant
10. The Plainsman (1936) (uncredited) .... Trooper
11. The Prisoner of Shark Island (1936) (uncredited) .... A Sergeant
12. Desert Guns (1936) (as Duke Lee) .... Steve Logan
13. Swifty (1935) (uncredited) .... Duke (posse rider)
14. The Phantom Empire (1935) (uncredited) .... Tom Baxter - chap. 1-2
15. The Lottery Lover (1935) (uncredited) .... Knife Thrower
16. Judge Priest (1934) (uncredited) .... Deputy
17. Adventures of Texas Jack (1934) .... Steve Parson/Colonel Cody
18. The Whirlwind Rider (1934) (as Duke Lee) .... The Sheriff
19. Man of the Forest (1933) (uncredited) .... Jake, a henchman
20. The Fighting Texans (1933) (uncredited) .... Marshal
21. Deadwood Pass (1933) (as Duke Lee) .... Deputy
22. When a Man Rides Alone (1933) (uncredited) .... Replaced by Al Bridge, billed 3rd on posters as Duke Lee
23. Flaming Guns (1932) (as Duke Lee) .... Red McIntyre

Sadly, I don't have any photographs except for one with Buffalo Bill; I think one of my siblings has a couple of other photos of the circus, etc.

Then there's character actor (deceased) Akim Tamiroff, on my mother's side (by marriage.) He wasn't circus folk, but he was theater/movie folk, and his wife, my great aunt, Tamara Shayne, and her brother Konstantin Shayne and so on . . .


So yes, it's true. I really do come from circus folk. And that's why I defend the Contactees, and denounce efforts to create a UFOlogical Guild, Congress, Organization, -- any Official UFO Anything that would strive to keep the clowns out, and the self-appointed arbiters of Holy UFOlogy in.


Sometimes I think I'll write a book about all this; but it's not as glamorous as it might sound. Duke Lee died when I was little; Louise was working as a live-in cook in some millionaire's house in Beverly Hills when I was growing up, and I only met the the people on my mother's side a few times when I was young.

Still, it's in my blood, which probably explains a lot of things . . .

Notes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_R._Lee

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0497200/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0848667/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0790175/

Charles Fort

A Collector of Data:

Sometimes I am a collector of data, and only a collector, and am likely to be gross and miserly, piling up notes, pleased with merely numerically adding to my stores. Other times I have joys, when unexpectedly coming upon an outrageous story that may not be altogether a lie, or upon a macabre little thing that may make some reviewer of my more or less good works mad. But always there is present a feeling of unexplained relations of events that I note, and it is this far-away, haunting, or often taunting, awareness, or suspicion, that keeps me piling on. ~ Charles Fort

(Talents, p.862)

Snarly Skepticism

I'm still here, just working in the real world as well as working on some UFO/Fortean related projects.

I have a new post up at Snarly Skepticism.


And a couple of new ones at Women Of Esoterica.

How Will We Ever Know If It´s "Full" Disclosure?

I wrote this the other day; it's up at American Chronicle. After hearing Richard Dolan's presentation last night, I've been thinking about this more. There's always the possibility of disclosure by "them," -- the aliens, or whatever/whoever they are. Open, full disclosure, not the covert, one on one disclosures that have been taking place. This isn't the final response to the idea of disclosure, or addresses all of it. It's just one angle into what really is a complex idea, with many potential ramifications.

How Will We Ever Know If It´s "Full" Disclosure?

The hopes for full disclosure about UFOs will remain forever unfulfilled.

There are earnest efforts by many, pushing for disclosure, but that day when the government reveals all will never come. As I´ve said many times, there are a few reasons for this opinion. One, the elusive, covert nature of the phenomena is an innate part of the phenomena.

One aspect of this dance (close, far, in your face, jump back, hide, blatantly expose itself with lights and beams and beings. . .) is its oppositional position alongside the infrastructure. Science, media, academia, governments, institutionalized religions, will never "take UFOs seriously." They´re not set up for that. They can´t.

The UFO phenomena experiences flaps not only in the UFOs themselves, like sightings and encounters, but in pop culture´s and societies awareness. From the popularity of TV shows on UFOS to governments releasing some of their files on UFOs, and witnesses (often decades later) coming forward, these things happen in waves. So it often looks like "ah, the big moment is sure to come any minute now!"

No, it isn't.

One thing that always surprises me about the hopes for disclosures is the acceptance that whatever government, via whatever agency, is releasing everything it knows. I highly suspect that for every bunch of stuff released by MOD, or the FBI, or the French government, the Russian government, etc. there are tons of papers yet to be released. Or redacted. Or burned, shredded, conveniently "lost," and so on.

How do we know that what is released publicly is the real thing? Just because they say so? What´s the story behind the little we´re allowed to see?



Efforts for disclosure are well meaning, and while I don't think it´s going to change anything, it can´t hurt. We have learned some things, and that´s good.

Just be aware that we´re never getting the whole story, and we never will. There isn´t some global plan among the governments of the world to simultaneously release all it knows on UFOs.

This jaded view of disclosure doesn't mean I´m anti-conspiracy. The documented history of governments mind control programs, debunking campaigns, weapons and psy-ops makes it quite clear that we are targets to be used at their whim. This is certainly as scary as aliens. A mass landing, caught on tape, aired on CNN? Sure. But are they aliens, or some kind of staged by humans event? The MILAB (military abductions) scenario is still considered pretty paranoid by many within the UFO field; as long as we hold the view that governments wouldn´t do things like this, we´ll remain naive.

Whenever new information is released, we need to consider that we´re only getting a little bit of the story; that there is very likely much more to be learned. For every piece of information we get, there are many pieces left behind. And for every document allowed to enter the public arena, we have to look at it with some skepticism. Just because they say it´s so, doesn´t mean it´s so.

Catastrophes and UFOs: It's Not a Contest

Recent catastrophes; earthquakes in China, cyclones in Myanmar,tornadoes in the U.S., have caused some to once again demonize UFOs, or at least, those who choose to explore the mystery of UFOs.

Why the two would have anything to do with each other is beyond me, but the supposed thinking of those who use these tragedies to support their peevish anti-UFO stance makes sense to them, obviously.

Skeptics of many varieties (including, paradoxically, those who acknowledge there are UFOs) don’t like most UFO researchers. That aside, they don’t like UFOs much either. They're always pissed off at them, because UFOS aren’t doing anything. The UFO phenomena’s continued behavior of remaining elusive is maddening, torturous in its contradictory, slippery manifestations. And yet, for all the years the UFOs have been around (centuries, really) for all the evidence, they haven't done anything. At least not in a grand, showy way; pulling off some mind blowing trick like turning mountains into ice cream sundaes or finally delivering those flying cars.

They haven’t fixed anything, saved anyone, cured any diseases, solved any of the world’s problems. They didn’t prevent the recent tragedies, or past disasters. They didn’t warn us. They haven’t stopped war. Racism, ageism, sexism, classism still exist, relgious hatreds and wars continue, people live in poverty. The aliens and UFOs haven't fixed any of it.

This makes some people downright mad. Instead of getting mad at a god, God, Jesus - they’re mad at UFOs. And they're madder still at people who study UFOs. The message seems to be that it’s somehow all our fault that tragedies happen. And if it isn’t our fault, exactly, and/or the UFOs, we’re still guilty by association just for seriously thinking about the subject.

I get the feeling these brands of skeptics (and beware; many of them insist they are not skeptics at all and are, in fact, in with the in crowd of UFO researchers) have a whole lot of expectations on what UFOs should do, and what they shouldn’t do. Which is ludicrous. They accuse us of being like children; frivolous children who chase after the fleeting, fragile UFO, when it’s they that are stuck in magical thinking.

Sure, I “believe” in aliens. Rather, I believe they exist. I believe aliens from other planets, as well as other entities, are all around us. I don’t believe in them, however. I don't pray to them or expect them to do anything.

I don’t believe every UFO is from outer space, piloted by ET.
I don’t believe ET, aliens, entities, Mothman, Bigfoot, or Lizard Man are going to save us, cure us, fix us, heal the planet, or teach me how to parallel park.

I don’t think only some should study UFOs, and others shouldn’t, and I don’t think anyone should, or, shouldn't, just because I said so. Or because anyone else said so.

I don’t care who’s who, or why, or what they do in their private life, (naturally there are some boundaries here, Christ people, use your common sense) if they party too much, or not enough, -- they “get to” delve into the mysteries of life as much as anyone. In fact, god knows, we need more people getting deep into this stuff!

Using the very real horrors of this world to bash UFO or Fortean research is dishonest. It’s disingenuous. It’s lazy. It distracts from both the world’s cruel realities, as well as anomalous research.

The two aren’t in a contest with each other; don’t make it one. Don’t pit one phenomena against the other as some sort of moral barometer of any given individual.

Nick Redfern: New Blog

Wow, King of the Fortean Blogs fer sure, Redfern has another new blog, this one that reviews books, DVDs, etc. on Fortean subjects. Send him your stuff...eheck out his blog. Er, blogs, lol. It's called Fortean Reviews.

http://forteanreviews.blogspot.com/

MIBS, Mothman and Mom

A recent post at Mothman Flutterings on a conversation with mom today.

Nick Redfern's New Blog on Culture of Contact

Nick Redfern, Esoteric Blog King, has a new blog at Culture of Contact. Nick’s entry is: “My 3,2,1 of UFO Hatred,” which is very good. I had to laugh at Redfern's comments on the idea aliens are benevolent:

No. 2: The Aliens are our friends
Pleeeeez! No! Fuck Off!

That's to the point! I agree; why assume, even when we’re told by them (the alien guys) are benevolent? Beware the messenger; just because they say it’s so, doesn’t mean it is so.Anyway, (and I say this even though Vaeni didn’t ask me go join :) -- good blog post over there. Be sure to take a look.

Esoteric Junk Mail

My latest on Tim Binnall's site for my Trickster's Realm column over there: Esoteric Junk Mail.

http://binnallofamerica.com/tr5.5.8.html

As always, be sure to read all the other great columns over there, including Lesley's Grey Matters and Richelle's Medusa's Ladder.

Mysterious red lights in sky

Interesting. This is from April of 2008, Phoenix, Arizona. Air Force says it doesn't know and they didn't have anything, and the person who took this said he's never seen anything like this. Unfortunately, the newsreporter and the witness dance around the word UFO, as if UFO itself is tainted. Which, thanks to both the pathological skeptics and the rabid believers, UFO has come to mean "little green men" from space.
But I digress.

The New X-Files Movie, Torchwood

Of course I'll go see it! But naturally! I think the title is just awful: "I Want To Believe" Really?

I like Amanda Peet and Bill Connolly, who are also in the movie. All the usual hype and hush about the movie; the plot line, Mulder and Scully's "romance" (er, didn't they have a baby -- kind of puts the need for adolescent questions about their relationship to rest, doesn't it?) but I don't care about any of it. It's a new X-Files movie! What more is there?

Well, there's Torchwood. A great show; was so sorry to see season two end so quickly. (And so damn sadly.) Dear husband "George" says it's better than X-Files, but for myself, it's not "better" it's not a question of "better." Torchwood is the X-Files of its time, I suppose. Hipper, certainly more sexually open. Torchwood also deals a lot more with human emotions and pathos, etc. than X-Files did. You either like that a lot (I do) or you don't. Depends on one's temperament. Both have sexy main characters, which helps quite nicely.

I'm glad Torchwood has come along and filled the void X-Files left.

Bill Birnes: UFO Zealotry and Existentialism

I love this post by Bil Birnes of UFO Magazine and UFO Hutners: UFO Zealotry and Existentialism. Doesn't matter what you think of Birnes, or UFO Hunters, or the magazine, or really, anything else. He makes valid points that every UFO pundit, researcher, investigator and writer should heed. Look, people, (to those of whom this thus applies) GROW UP!

It's ironic that there are individuals taking UFOs seriously enough to write about them in whatever way, and expect to be taken seriously, yet whine and moan, insult and sneer at others, lie about others, at the drop of a hat. So I ask you dahlings, how can, why would, anyone listen to these people when they behave so badly?

Another irony is in the cries for some sort of "cleansing" of the study of UFOs. Get rid of those to young, or too old, the wrong gender, the wrong theories, like the wrong music, and so on. Meanwhile, UFOs themselves don't behave in any particularly predictbale, narrow, rigid mamner. Yet we want to approach the things that are nebulous and contradictory with anything but an open view.

Alien Dreamtime - Terence McKenna DMT rap

"Machine Elves and Bejeweled Basketvilles" . . . A sort of beat poem rap on tripping with Terrence McKenna. . ."An ecology of souls" . . . "Don't think about who we are . . .do it, do it now" . . .find the button . . .making the voice an object, singing things into existence. . .the power and transformation of sound . . ."I wondered what it meant, and why it felt so good, if it didn't mean anything . . ." the power of words, the knowledge of words . . .

Mothman: Dream Fragment and Warnings About Warnings

I have a new post up at Mothman Flutterings: Dream Fragmet and a Warning About a Warning.

http://orangeorb.net/blog/