Monday, December 28, 2015

"Regan Lee, Someone I've Never Heard Of…"

That modifier implies that, since he's never heard of me, my opinions do not matter. Who is "he?" Sean Meers, who has a lengthy tome on censorship, attacks, who said what when how and why, defenses of Jacbos, Hopkins and more -- much more. You can read it all here: Case Related Hate Mail - The Linda Cortile UFO Abduction Case Website.

As I often comment, it's not only the mystery of UFOs themselves that I find so damn intriguing, it's also the drama that constantly swirls around such mystery that I find equally intriguing. For example, this, under the heading "Name Calling and Harassment from Regan Lee":
Regan Lee, someone who I’ve never heard of, wrote an article reiterating the claims of the individuals who labelled me an internet censor for reporting unsubstantiated and abusive personal attacks on others to internet service providers.  As with the individual’s she’s supporting her comments are ignorant, personally abusive, and predicated on the lies of others. (Sean Meers)
We all have our opinions. This is what I wrote in March of 2014 and what he reposted at his site:

Internet UFO Police Officer Sean Meers 
     This is from Jeremy Vaeni (who, as I've said before, is one of the few writing really good stuff on what goes in UFO World, as well as what's going on within us in relation to UFOs) on a highly offended individual named Sean Meers. [see Vaeni: Sean Meers, Internet Censorship, and YOU] We do not know if Sean Meers is his real name or not, but regardless, Meers has gone after Emma Woods -- remember, she is the victim -- for writing about her experiences with David Jacobs. He has also gone after Carol Rainey, who has written about what she observed concerning Budd Hopkins.Now this is from Feb. 20, and in the world of news, be it everyday items or the anomalous realm, often isn't considered relevant unless it happened ten minutes ago. And while I've been following Emma's story (and Rainey's) since the beginning, this one escaped my attention at the time.     This issue is very much alive; internet trolls, deluded individuals, sexist morons, and the gullible who will defend the indefensible when their beliefs are seemingly attacked.     UFOs are real. Non-human entities are real. Government black ops fucking with our heads is real. So much high strangeness, unexplained, bizarre, spiritually uplifting, soul sucking degrading, wondrous, creepy, stuff, is real. I do not apologize or defend such opinions. If you don't believe in ghosts or UFOs or angels or Bigfoot or entities from afar, that's your issue, not mine.      People who somewhere along their path of exploration of these mysteries suddenly psychotically lose it do not negate my experiences or opinions, and it shouldn't yours, either. The fact that some have abused their positions and knowledge (Jacobs, to some extent Hopkins, etc.) doesn't mean a damn thing in terms of experience of the "other." But it sure as hell does mean a lot concerning ethics and morals and behavior and the nature of research.      And yet, it seems, some such as Meers cannot tolerate hearing that their gods have been exposed for what they really are. They go after the victims and the witnesses (Woods, Rainey) and demand that their stories be scrubbed from the internet.     Then again, we have people like Jeremy Vaeni, Jack Brewer, and Alfred Lehmberg among others, who have been continuing this good fight against the self-elected UFO Police who want to not only silence others, but make sure their experiences disappear, as if none of this ever happened, and only the perpetrators words remain. (Regan Lee)
Now really, I don't see what is "personally abusive" nor "harassment."  I call Meers on his need for censorship. His opinions I disagree with, but that's another matter. I am allowed to state that I do not find censorship a valid tack to take. I am also allowed to state my opinions. How this is "abusive" or "harassment" is anyone's guess.

Oops, I did call him a "little thug" in this post, which he also reposted in full on his site:
Emma Woods Files | Information about the Research of Dr. David M. Jacobs of Temple UniversitySean Meers may have been successful in his vendetta against Emma Woods and the reason for her previous site to be removed, but she has a new one at WordPress. WordPress isn't so concerned with silly smug miffed individuals who want to rid the world of things they find messes with their belief systems. Good for WordPress, and good for Emma Woods who has not allowed little thugs like Meers get their way:

Dr. Jacobs conducted ninety-one hypnotic regressions with me during thirty-seven hypnosis sessions, from December 2004 through February 2007. He conducted all the hypnosis sessions over the telephone, thousands of miles from my location. I was alone in my apartment, with no supervision.
While I was Dr. Jacobs’ research subject, his behavior became, in my considered personal opinion, increasingly bizarre and psychologically abusive.
I have provided information about Dr. Jacobs’ research practices here, as I believe that it is matter of public interest. I hope that this can help to prevent similar distressing situations occurring to other research subjects in the future.
Emma Woods Files | Information about the Research of Dr. David M. Jacobs of Temple University: For several years, I was a research subject of “alien abduction” researcher, Dr. David M. Jacobs, of Temple University.


Alfred Lehmberg said...

I'm reminded of Gene Steinberg getting me thrown entirely off the internet... said...

Thanks for posting about this, Regan. There is not one piece of "hate mail" in those sections on the websites Meers manages. It says a lot ....