Friday, February 17, 2012

One Metal Box Theory: Radiation and Disinformation

At the back of my mind limped the dark thought that all the authoritative sources cited concerning the glowing, sceeching, impervious metal boxes on Oregon coasts were covering up, or at best, dupes in a larger cover-up. I also thought that researchers, like Linda Moultan Howe, who interviewed these authorities, gave up too easily.

So the story goes, residents insist they have not seen a thing, someone made a YouTube video on how it was all a hoax, authorities deny anything strange at all. And that's very likely.

Still, that nagging thought of a "what if" in the back of my mind. Not a "what if" as in alien from outer space, but something to do with Fukushima, and/or covert government activity. When I told Jim this story of the strange metal boxes and the seeming "no there there" aspect his immediate response was that these boxes have something to do with monitoring radiation. (Or, on further research, metal boxes containing radioactive waste.)

Now if that's so, it seems, as I've mentioned in previous posts, pretty rash to go up to these boxes-- for example, using them as material for ones art.

More importantly, if it's true, the truth about the radiation levels continues to be hidden from us. Throw in distractions and disinformation about aliens, UFOs, and hoaxes, and there you have it.

5 comments:

Gabriele Lamarina said...

EXCLUSIVE! The truth about STRANGES METAL BOXS appeared to Stonefield Beach in Oregon

http://www.cronacheterrestri.com/cronache-terrestri/esclusivo-la-verita-sulle-strane-scatole-di-metallo-apparse-a-stonefield-beach-in-oregon

Please if you use this article mentions the source. (www.cronacheterrestri.com) Thanks ;)

Regan Lee said...

Er, I didn't mention any source. I always link to sources when I cite something specifically. I'll give you a plug, in that I published your comment, but I don't feel the need to provide links in the above post.

Gabriele Lamarina said...

I'm sorry... I was hoping that a bit of truth in the middle of so many lies were welcome ... Perhaps I was wrong ... I linked the article with the whole truth about the event ... if you want, your readers believe the Mayan prophecies on metal boxes, or the lies written by Huliq you can safely delete my link. I thought there was nothing wrong to publish a link. Sorry again. Bye

Gabriele Lamarina said...

however, if you need article translated into English, let me know that I'll translate it and you can publish on your site.

Regan Lee said...

Gabriele: I'm sorry... I was hoping that a bit of truth in the middle of so many lies were welcome ...
The point is, you implied that I should have given a specific citation in my post. And I replied why none was needed in that particular post.

Perhaps I was wrong ... I linked the article with the whole truth about the event
At this point, who knows what the truth is, or isn't. It does seem pretty clear that at the least, the whole thing had nothing to do with UFOs, even if there were UFO sightings in the area at the time. Which I don't doubt, but the question is: did those boxes have something to do with UFOs? Very unlikely.

... if you want, your readers believe the Mayan prophecies on metal boxes, or the lies written by Huliq you can safely delete my link. I thought there was nothing wrong to publish a link. Sorry again. Bye

Implying that I somehow was lying or guilty of some sort of plagerism or whatever simply because I didn't use your link (or any link, since, again, none was needed) is inaccurate.

I do not "want my readers" to believe or not believe anything. They can think for themselves.