Saturday, March 22, 2008


For awhile there I was playing around with manipulating photographs of UFO and paranormal locations and events, creating them as art pieces. This is one of those attempts, using the iconic Trent photo. I've done a few others that I'll post when I have a chance.

May 16 and 17th are the dates for the UFO Fest in McMinnville, Oregon. The festival is an homage to the Paul and Evelyn Trent UFO sighting in McMinnville in 1950. We went last year, and it was fun, even though we were lost, (hopelessly lost), rushed, suffering from low blood sugar, and forgot our camera!

This year we're already booked -- we'll be staying at the Hotel Oregon. Be sure to let me know if you plan to attend; I'd love to meet with others there! I'll have my laptop with me of course so emailing me is a sure way to contact me.

Richard Dolan is the speaker at this year's event. I'm looking forward to that!

For more information on the UFO Fest in McMinnville, lodging info, etc. visit here.

The Sigh Files

If ever a UFO Guild We're The Only Ones You Should Be Listening To organization gets itself going --which of course, I hope never does, the very idea is an abomination - one of the first things they need to do is pass a law that condemns the use of the following phrases: "anal probe" and "tin foil hat wearing."

Friday, March 21, 2008

UFO Magazine Time!

My UFO Magazine hat arrived today. Thanks Nancy Birnes! You can see what the hat looks like by watching UFO Hunters with Bill Birnes on the History Channel, Wednesdays at 7:00pm PST, of course. Or visit Lesley's Debris Field blog, where she models the hat to simply effervescent effect, dahlings.

The new issue is now available, with articles on the Stephenville UFO sightings, Daniel Brenton and Red Moon, my column on Brenton's Signal to Noise and the Contactees, and the greatly titled piece by Farah Yurdozu: Mary Poppins, Alien Abductions, and Gurdijeff. (Farah, among other things, is a contributor to my blog Women Of Esoterica.) Lesley writes, in her Beyond the Dial column, on skeptics: Foo on the Skeptics, and Foo on the Debunkers. Right on Lesley. (Yes, I still say "right on." I'm old, I live in Oregon.)I liked what Lesley wrote about a recent Culture of Contact episode with Frank Feschino and Alfred Lehmberg:
Not only was the fantastic Frank Feschino on, but also my friend Alfred. I don't know very many of the other columnists here at UFO Magazine, but I do know both Alfred and Jeremy.

I was kind of half-hoping that Alfred would say something so outrageous that would make Jeff Ritzman turn purple but it didn't happen. Alfred was a total gentleman, as he normally is, or at least he has always been to me.


(I second that. Alfred gets a lot of grief from people who don't get him, don't want to get him, and started it in the first place. The difference is that Alfred isn't passive aggressive, while many people are. Then they act surprised, affronted, insulted, that Alfred calls them on it; and, overall, doesn't suffer fools gladly. That's my take anyway. Plus, he knows what he's talking about.)

Lots of other good things in the issue. My next column in UFO Magazine (also called the OrangeOrb) will be about Contactee Dana Howard.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

"Oh yes they do!"

I was visiting with my friend "Lola" the other day. Things almost always turn esoteric very quickly when we get together. Lola is my friend who lives in the coastal range; the one with a family full of paranormal encounters: ghosts, entities, psi, Bigfoot, UFOs . . .

Anyway, we were talking about UFOs and aliens and related things, and she shared with me that someone she knows in her small town used to live in the south, where, according to this person, they saw UFOs almost every day. Everyone was seeing them. But no on was talking about them. This person said the military was always hanging around, glaring at people and buying them drinks to get them drunk to keep them talking, or to stop them from talking, I forget which. Lola couldn't remember where in Florida this took place. "Gulf Breeze?!" I asked excitedly. "No, it wasn't Gulf Breeze," Lola said. Hmmm.

Lola said to her friend that UFOs are incredible, we just don't have the technology to make these things. "Oh yes they do!" her friend said vehemently. For her friend used to live on a military base. Then there was lots of juicy stuff about near MIB encounters and other weirdness.

"Lola," I said, firmly. "You have to put me in contact with this person!" I paused. "You must!"

Lola of course knew that, and so, we'll see if I can meet this person and find out more.

This conversation had me thinking about a common UFO meme; that we don't have the technology to do the things many UFOs do. How do we know that? We don't. It does seem fantastic, but not impossible. What "they" know, we only get to know years -- decades -- later. If at all. Der. In a moment of synchronicity, I came across something today about Nick Redfern's views on the Phoenix Lights event. He thinks it was a staged event by us, not aliens. I wouldn't be surprised.

I still believe there are aliens around, and that they're even here, but that doesn't exclude the government's participation in all this, not for a minute. Half the stuff we see and experience are thanks to our covert individuals, not aliens or other non-human entities. Which is almost as scary as accepting that UFOs, missing time, and all the other UFO weirdness are caused by extraterrestrials. Which is scarier: ET, or our own government(s) using us as guinea pigs? And why do so many of us within UFO studies reject the latter possibility?

Meanwhile, I'll wait for Lola's friend to contact me.

Sunday, March 16, 2008

The UFO Tarot


I collect Tarot and divination decks, and was idly looking through the House of Tarot website, and found this: The UFO Tarot deck. It was bound to happen!

You can see more decks that I found interesting on the Women Of Esoterica blog.

Friday, March 14, 2008

UFOs and PSYOPS

I’m not only a flying saucer junkie but a covert paranoid conspiracy psy-op men in black government spooks junkie. To a point; no, I don’t believe giant reptilians are stirring vats of human body parts in vast underground rooms beneath New Mexico or Arizona.

So I was pleased to see this by Franklin Fields: Are Psychological Operations (PSYOPs) Used to Influence Public Opinion of UFOs?. With a chart and everything.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Random Things

This whole Anonymous anti-Scientology wave has me a bit nervous; as I've written here recently. I rant some more on it on my blog

Chronic Skepticism. (Which I'm thinking of changing to 'snarly skepticism.")

Usually my Trickster's Realm column for Binnall of America appears on Mondays; this week it will go up sometime today, Friday the 14th.. As always, be sure to read Lesley's Grey Matters, Khyron's The K-Files, Tina Sena's Esoterica, and Richelle Hawks Medusa's Ladder.

I'm pushing Mating Hedgehogs. So much over there, and yet so lonely . . .please, visit this wondrous quirky blog and give it some hope?

Sunday, March 9, 2008

The Secret United Nations Meeting; Uh-Huh

Thanks to Kithra, a Women Of Esoterica contributor, for her item on the supposed recent United Nations “secret” UFO panel.

Kithra included a link to the often neglected (in my opinion) and very good blog Strange Attractor, who has a good piece on this, including input from Jacques Vallee.

Here’s how Vallee describes the series of events regarding this meeting:
It seems to me this story is falling apart but the structure is very interesting — along the lines of a psywar rumor process:
(italics mine.)

The Scientology Meme: Mob Mentality

I’m no fan of Scientology, (had a personal negative experience with them involving a family member when I was young) but I’m no fan of organized religions or organized anythings. Like Groucho Marx once said:
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.

On many esoteric blogs, as well as the anti-esoteric blogs and forums (otherwise known as “skeptics”) there’s been a lot of self righteous anti-Scientology posts. Well, yeah, okay. Let’s go after the Vatican, various Christian sects, Islamic extremists, the Raelians, Buddhists (just because they’re not American and are suspect you know), Yoga, and Jews. Oh, and Wicca. Let’s go after all religions, spiritual and philosophical systems. Get rid of them!

The reasons why so many all over the world are now going after Scientology have to do with its existence on the fringe. Everyone’s gone after all the above mentioned systems; and many of those systems (Catholics, Jews, Muslims) are accepted by mainstream culture. As soon as you step over that line of what’s accepted, you’re fair game. Scientologists, like Mormons and Wiccans for example. are suspect. Their rights to freedoms, in this country anyway, are swept off the table, because, well, they’re weird. And if we think it’s weird, really weird, then we get to vilify. We’ll leave the Methodists alone but don’t be going around saying you’re a Scientologist or practice Wicca. Then we’ll get you. Get you good.

Another reason for the smug sense of being Very Reasonable, is the fear of criticizing religious Muslim extremists for what they are: fanatics. We don't dare go near there for fear of staring up something, or being “anti Muslim” and vilifying an entire group of people.

The same with Judaism, though less so. Everyone from the Left to the Right and in between gets to insist they’re “not anti-Semitic, just anti-Israel,” before they launch into a long winded, often erroneous, mini history of why Israel is so evil. But that aside, most people leave that alone as well. (Wait, no they don’t, look at Rense.com.)

The point is, no, I don’t like Scientology. (Although, as with all of these systems, don’t be so quick to throw the baby out with the bath water.) But there are issues far bigger than Scientology to focus your wrath on. The occupation (er, “war”) in Iraq. Global warming/climate changes/whatever the hell you want to call it, we’re all gonna die save the earth damnit, alternative energies, child abuse, elder abuse, domestic abuse, animal abuse (Christ, we’re an abusive species!) poverty, education . . .

I’ve noticed that for those who proudly state they’re “skeptics” -- those very same who remain stubbornly ignorant of the facts when it comes to UFOs, who assume all kinds of wild things regarding the paranormal -- are quick to believe the most paranoid, outlandish things about things they want to annihilate.

I suppose one thing that bothers me in particular about this is the idea that those working so hard towards eliminating or “exposing” Scientology feel so damn proud of themselves, as if they’ve brought us a rare gift from another realm. This rare gift is presented as enlightenment from ignorance and superstition. It's an intellectual coup.

Kind of like what they do with UFO and paranormal topics. There are those within and on the fringe (the chronic skeptics looking in) of UFO studies who insist UFOlogy needs some sort of guild, organization, committee -- some kind of official body --- that will once and for all get rid of all that embarrasses and angers, and keep only what is approved. (Who gets to do the approving, and why, well, you see why it's a problem. . .)

Exercising our right to voice our opinions about these things is one thing, and exposing illegal or unethical methods is a good thing. Other than that, ranting on an almost daily basis, hacking into web sites and calling for blood seems over the top.

What disturbs me is the momentum. Worldwide, people have been unquestioningly and happily joining in protests against Scientology. And it’s this crowd gathering/one-mind vibe that has me worried. At some point, the lines blur: who are the ones acting as a mob, as a single unit, as a controlling mass? That’s scary.

Friday, March 7, 2008

Search Phrases

I love that people from all over the world visit The OrangeOrb. Thanks to my map stats thingie, I can see the search phrases that people have used that brought them here.

Some are interesting. . . like:
hypnosis and mind control night chills
It isn’t uncommon for abductees to complain of feeling chilled during a hypnosis session, but “night chills?”

INVISIBLE+ALIENS

I like the insistence of this: all in caps, no bones about it, invisible AND aliens, damnit! As readers know, I’ve written a few different items on what I call invisible aliens. Seems I’m not the only one not seeing them.

meaning of orange orbs
Hmmm, well, don’t think I helped. If I knew what the meaning was, I wouldn’t have this blog.

nick redfern penn and teller
That’s one trio I don’t want to know about. Although Nick would probably have a good old time and be just fine. Me, I don’t have the patience. Also, it’s probably a guy thing.

what do orange orbs mean?

Another one who seeks. Or is it the same person? Did they see an orange orb too?

orange thing in the sky on 5th march

Hmmm, where, when? Who?

what if an orb keeps following me?

The mystery is beginning to make a bit of sense . . .

ufo bubbles
I don’t know what those are, but they sound like fun

A few phrases around UFO Fest McMinnville (coming up this May; I’ll be there! If you plane on being there let me know!)

And a few on women researchers and UFO weird Bigfoot.

UFO Cloud Today


image credit: Photo by Rob Alexander www.weatherwizkids.com/photoart.htm

On my way to work this morning (about 7:50am) I noticed an unusual and beautiful cloud formation above Spencer's Butte to the south. It looked a lot like the image here. A few blocks away, where I work, I walked out onto the field to take a picture with my cell phone, but the cloud was gone, or rather, I couldn't see anything like it. I walked around, trying different angles, but nothing.

Hearing My Name

I've experienced hearing my name called, but not for several years. A number of times yesterday, and once today, I heard someone calling my name. It sounded very close by, yet distant at the same time; loud. And hard to tell if it was male or female; it really sounded like both. Maybe a bit less masculine, but hard to say if it was completely feminine either.

This is a bit weird, but not unusual in the realm of the esoteric. I think there's an obvious connection between this and my working with meditation and crystals lately. For the past week or so I've been working in this way on a very intense and serious level.

Some say that hearing your name is a sign from guides, or those who've passed on. Some cultures believe it's malevolent spirits trying to get your attention. (I don't follow those traditions.) And of course, there's the secular explanation: you're nuts.

It feels to me that I've been heard, and they're letting me know.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

It's My Birthday!

Happy Birthday To Me!

Yes, as I am wont to say now and then, sometimes it is all about me, and March is all about me because my birtday is the 14th, and I celebrate all month long. Everyone should celebrate their birthdays all month long!

Lots of very cool people born in March, (besides me) -- here are some esoteric (can you spot why?) March birthdays:

Dr. Seuss, Harry Houdini, L.Ron Hubbard, B.F. Skinner, Leonard Nimoy, Christopher Walken, Albert Einstein, Vincent Van Gogh, John Astin, Lucy Lawless, Alyson Hannigan, William Shatner, Louis L’Amour, Patrick McGoohan, Bruce Willis, Edward Everett Horton, Rudolf Nureyev, Frank Borman, Percival Lowell, Douglas Adams, James Doohan . . .

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Stephenville Tracker Steve Hammons

Steve Hammons has been reporting on the Stephenville,Texas UFO sightings all along. Of all the UFO pundits writing about this, Hammons has been one of the steadiest, with the most actual information. His latest item on UFO Digest -- Patrol car videotape, news media are factors in Texas UFO case --- reveals interesting details that show this story (like many others) is not dead.

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Joseph Capp on The Breaking Point

A fresh perspective into UFOs and the people who see them is UFO Breaking Point, at UFO Media Matters, Joseph Capp’s blog.

Capp discusses the psychological effect on UFO witnesses, including witnesses with multiple sightings. He says, of disclosure:
I really have had strong problems with the idea that wide or complete public knowledge of ET presence would not be a profound shock to many, many people, that it must be assumed that the masses of regular people will simply go about their daily lives as though nothing happened.

On the contrary: I believe a kind of ET Shock would take hold. I suspect ET Shock would marginalize rational thinking in many people who need the safety blanket of Business As Usual in our busy, spin saturated world.

(I often say that, after a small period of adjustment, we’d all go back to normal, but I’ve been rethinking this recently. And here I find Capp’s comments on this topic; another bit of synchronicity. I think many subcultures and already marginalized groups wouldn’t be in shock -- they’ve been expecting it. But the infrastructures and mainstream, which after all are the ones that count as far as control goes, would be turned upside down. That’s why full disclosure won’t happen, and exopolitics, while well meaning, is a bit pointless. On the other hand, it’s presumptive of us to assume anything when it comes to this subject. But we can speculate, which is what we’re all trying to do; just deal with what we know so far and have experienced.)

Capp writes of his own UFO sighting, and the affect it’s had on him -- all these years later. As with my own “obsession” and so many others, those of us who’ve had sightings oftentimes spend years searching for clues and answers -- even knowing no one size fits all answer will ever come -- we still take part in the process of discovery. Why?

And this last paragraph was another bit of Synchronicty between my recent musings on the phenomena and Capp’s closing paragraph:
So in our own community we need to understand that UFO people are not “off” because they actually believe in UFOs; some of them have become “Off” by dealing personally with this profound, and often psychologically shattering experience as best as they knew how.

I’ve been thinking a lot the past few weeks about our isolation from each other, even within the field of UFOlogy and Fortean studies. Not only is our culture decompartmentalized, the subcultures of UFOlogy, etc. are as well. The often hostile divisions between nuts and bolts and more holistic theories, between paranormal Bigfoot and flesh and blood Bigfoot, and so on, further divide, and by doing so, reinforce the loneliness, uncertainties, and confusion within individuals. Throw in the skeptics -- who, like it or not are a part of this since they insist on being vocal on the fringes of the fringe -- and the experience is far from cohesive or supportive.

Our technological culture doesn’t allow for these kinds of experiences,including religious ones. We tolerate some mainstream religions and misuse the more fundamental varieties to strengthen the fascism and theocracy leanings of government,(the control aspect) but there is not a culture of acceptability when it comes to the spiritual, supernatural, paranormal esoteric world that has lived alongside us for millennia.

It’s not at all surprising UFO and other phenomena are kept at arm’s length by society. Unless the topic is to be dismantled (debunkers, pathological skeptics,) or exploited (entertainment, television programs on the topic) it’s still held out as highly questionable. You can voice your beliefs on Christianity at work, and come right out and say that “Halloween is a holy day and so shouldn’t be celebrated” and you’ll be treated with respect, no matter how grudgingly. Sure enough, no Halloween party will happen, and you’ll even have a few coworkers chide you if you use the word Halloween. (I know, I experience this every year.) Talk about your church and you’re tolerated, if not downright accepted as being “normal.” For the most part, say you're a religious person of an accepted religion, and you're "normal." The activist atheist excepted, those will be tolerated in society. Venture out just a bit though, and you're suspect; even Mormonism is off the edge. The message is: don't stray too far from the relgious paradigm. Mention UFOs or Bigfoot, and people literally snort in your face. This isn’t news to anyone of course.

The point is, in our society we’ve moved far away from the acknowledgment of “the other” to the point of outright denial it exists. And within the UFO arena, this same attitude exists among its own. It isn’t any wonder, as Joseph Capp points out, that those who experience these things often go through psychological trauma, and may appear to be lost, off, confused, shaken, or gullible. And at a certain point, those labels become just that; labels. If we aren’t willing to give some kind of support -- which doesn’t mean agreement or total acceptance -- I really think we should shut up. Those that come on heavy and thuggish aren’t contributing to the field in any way, despite whatever praise they receive. There’s no pride in coming off as a bully, or being snide. Rejecting various aspects of the phenomena as not worth the time for its perceived silly factor is not a sign of intellectual superiority; it’s a sign of intentional ignorance.

The obsessive path many a UFO experiencer or writer takes sometimes ends badly; even death. Suicides, mysterious deaths, mental illness, paranoia; UFO history has its share of people who've gone this way. Many of us accept this as a risk we take, and go on. It's a fact many were victims of government mind games; psy ops, mind control, intentional games played with the UFO witness or researcher to ensure his or her isolation, not only from society, but from their own sub-culture of UFOlogists. Their own families. And we're partly repsonbile, for allowing these divisions to exist, for allowing the petty grudge matches to go on, and all the rest of the ugly side of UFOlogy to continue.

Joseph Capp suggests there may be a Part II to the article; I hope so!

Thursday, February 28, 2008

UFO Hunters on Rendlesham

UFO Hunters on Rendlesham

The first few moments of this episode got groans from George and myself; “Oh no, not another show on Rendlesham!” But it quickly turned out that it wasn’t just rehashing; for one thing, the little recreation of the lighthouse -- showing that what they saw could not have been the lighthouse -- along with the news that the light never faced that way in the first place, was pretty good. (As if anyone needed any more on the lighthouse theory; that’s right up there with owls and swamp gas.)

My thoughts are that what the witnesses saw that night were some kind of psy-op thing -- a staged event by humans, not ET. (A version of that theory holds that it was psy-ops. alongside ET, working cheerfully together to cause confusion among the masses.)

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Around the Orb

I'm always amazed at how quickly the week goes by.

BIGFOOT NEWS

On my blog Frame 352 (the stranger side of Sasquatch) I write about a person that contacted me about their encounters on their property somewhere in the south east. These encounters include orbs. With photos.

WOMEN OF ESOTERICA

I like where the blog is going, it's really wonderful to have others contributing. Farah Yurdozu has joined us, and she'll be sending us some comments about the Nevada UFO Conference, where she is now.

OTHER BLOGS
My Trickster Northwest and Chronic Skepticism blogs are feeling lonely. Please visit them!

BOOKS
I'm still reading Red Moon, but am also reading Andrew Colvin's book about Mothman: The Mothman's Photographer. I'm enjoying that very much!

For Now
Well, that's it. Not very much, is it? Between work and some health issues and other private matters, it isn't easy to devote the time I feel obsessed to devote to in this regard. I'm sure I'll bounce back with a vengeance though!

In the meanwhile, keep looking UP!

Saturday, February 23, 2008

The Tiny White Orb


A small white lighted sphere comes to visit -- twice.

About thirteen years ago, I was doing a lot of work with meditation and crystals. At that time I was experiencing a lot of precognitive dreams and “flashes” (sudden pictures “inserted” into my mind of what was to come, and sure enough, within the next forty eight hours or so, the premonition came true.) Some UFO stuff in there as well.

One experience I had one day was very strange. I woke up and turned over, to see my husband sitting on the edge of the bed. Just sitting there. Very strange, for he isn’t the sit around type; it’s not like him to just “sit there” -- and not be saying something, or doing something. Nope, he was just sitting there, very still, very quiet. It was unnerving.

Then I noticed a dime sized ball of light “dancing” around on his back. This wasn't an orb like a spirit/ghost orb, but a ball of light; solid, and very bright. This light -- and I had the distinct impression it was intelligent in some way -- was moving all over my husband's back. I couldn’t for the life of me figure out where that light was coming from. I moved, which should have done two things: make my husband (“George,”) move, say something, acknowledge my presence, and two, block the light; block the light source. But neither happened. George continued to sit there, perfectly still, and the dancing light continued to bop merrily along.

Very weird.

I felt strange, not psychically, but emotionally. So I went back to sleep. When I woke up, I almost had a heart attack. Because I woke up, found George sitting on the side of the bed, saw the same dancing light. What was going on? The difference this time was that when I spoke to George, he responded. He turned towards me. The light went away when he turned towards me and started talking.

I have no idea what that was; UFO/alien related, or what. But I cannot stress strongly enough that the first time, I was awake. AWAKE. NOT dreaming. NOT foggy, half in half out, nothing of the kind. I was as awake as I am now. AWAKE, I tell you. As awake as I am now.

Even though I didn’t see a UFO or aliens, or remember any kind of UFO related dream, I have a nagging feeling it’s related to UFOs somehow. And yet, at the same time, not neccesarily UFOs from outer space; there's a "fairy" kind of connection. I know this sounds odd at first, but recently I've been thinking about these connections (again) and in doing so, remembered this experience. But either way, the experience was definitely among the weirder things I’ve encountered.

Monday, February 18, 2008

Lehmberg: Illionois, Then Again

Alfred Lehmberg has a very good post on the Illinois sightings, and our continued resistance to acknowledging the huge things above our heads. . .

The craft was huge but danced the sky and spun upon its axis. Devoid of any commonness, it does nothing to relax us. And lit up like a Christmas tree it sped up now and then... to *shoot* to the horizon, trained observers tell us, friend.

As always, Lehmberg points out what should be obvious but isn’t, and asks the questions that peek out from behind this denial of the obvious in his Illionois Then, Again:
Honestly, are we doomed to live harrowing real lives beyond the only imagined terrors of the otherwise ignored alien visitation? Are we doomed to be led to a sick society's self-righteous slaughter by the hyper-privileged few who feel they have the divine right to profit from the exertions of we, the dues paying deluded... destroying the home of those deluded in the process?

Some think we’re in a UFO “flap” and I agree. It seems that way. But “flap” or no, we’ve all been aware of things in the sky for a very long time. Alfred asks:
What happened in Illinois on January 5th, 2000? Then what continues to happen over and over again in an accelerating cycle of the highest strangeness witnessed by hundreds or even thousands of credible persons?

It just keeps happening, right above our heads, and our denial and refusal to look into it also keeps happening. When will we get it?

That’s why I don’t get too annoyed over things like the Disclosure or Exopolitics movements; at least they’re trying. Better that than those who spend a lot of effort sneering and mocking, chiding and insulting. Better that than those who hide behind their quasi-intellects and veneers of false rationalities (for how rational is it to deny what’s been going on for so long?) and offer us disingenuous offerings of compromise: “oh, UFOs, sure, but who cares -- just lights in the sky.” That’s worse than outright denial.